Treatment vs. Regenerative Approach to Solving Problems

There are many schools of thought with regard to wellness. Just to name a few, the Buddhists believe the body is not so important while the spirit is supreme, whereas the Taoists believe the body and spirit are very much intertwined and the health of the body is paramount. In Western society, oftentimes systems are compartmentalized and we are encouraged to think in terms of treatment-based modalities. This is the backbone of modern Western medicine, medical practice, doctors, and the like.

Here within Rapid Regeneration, I don’t make any medical claims, don’t give medical advice, or make claims or give advice regarding diseases. Diseases are a concept that belong within the medical modality, and I don’t diagnose, treat, or even give advice about those intellectual concepts such as diseases or about other medical concepts.

Instead, I look at the body in a state of degeneration, disharmony, and how to build it back up with regeneration, into a state of harmony. I look at the body very simply, from a common sense point of view and a perspective within the context of nature, natural facts, and natural phenomena, which belong to all of us.

The preeminent philosophy we are offered, growing up as children in America, is to treat a symptom, in order to manage its difficulty and pain levels. As a child, this is simple enough to stomach because a cold or flu might come along which is seen as a temporary sickness — the symptoms are treated with medications and the whole thing is only a transient unpleasant experience lasting a few days. As an adult or when more serious symptoms occur throughout life, the medical community can sometimes describe the symptoms as likely to last a lifetime or that the persistence of the symptoms will be a lifelong liability for the individual.

What’s sad about treatment-based thinking is that it accepts that a root cause of the problem is unlikely to go away, be solved or be healed. Rather, you must live with these symptoms until you die — and you must therefore treat them. In this equation, the drug, device and treatment companies benefit financially as you become more dependent on them the further you drift into ‘Treatmentville’.

Within this widespread philosophy, if you have a cold, you should treat its symptoms. In fact, children all over are being given cough suppressants. This suppresses the lungs, heart, sinuses & in fact the entire autonomic nervous system. Meanwhile, the body was trying to get rid of some fluid, mucus, or perhaps some type of harmful organism. And yet, it is forced from the drugs to halt these natural functions of the body via suppressive treatment. When somebody experiences fever, and starts to overheat the body, killing harmful organisms and sweating out toxins, it is suggested that they take medicine which will extinguish a fever (which is generally not life-threatening anyway at less than 105 Fahrenheit).

Many treatments are simply suppressive, and in fact subdue a natural function of the body’s own intelligence. Other treatments will mask one problem and create another. Pain-relieving drugs can numb the pain, but can cause a litany of problems and side effects on the body and mind. Side effects of pharmaceutical products are one of the great causes of debilitating nightmares and even deaths in our time.

This is all part of the treatment-based philosophy that is followed like orthodoxy or religious dogma. In fact, medical doctors are the new priest class in my view. In the olden days, during the Middle Ages, you were never allowed to question a Catholic priest — to do so was blasphemous. And today you find the same phenomenon except this time instead of wearing black smocks the new priest class of modern society wear white coats.

Doctors are not bad people either, on average. However they are more often than not the type of individuals who do follow rather blindly what they are told to study, learn, practice and implement. They are not necessarily the most independent-minded group of men and women, when compared with other segments of the population. People in other vocations which are more innovative and free-thinking have to figure out ‘how to think’ in order to effectively solve problems and get results, whereas medical doctors are essentially taught ‘what to think’. It seems like being a medical professional is a great choice as a very reliable career with good pay, but is not a good place for people who question authority or rock the boat.

The people who join the medical professional community, by means of the right of passage of going through numerous years of academia and medical residencies, are taught treatments, one after the other, with very little time spent properly explaining as to why the body has broken down in the first place. The explanation of the theory of the way things are goes as such: A medical disease could be assigned to you because of your bad genes, like a life sentence, or a disease could be like something you catch, almost like bad luck, and if you catch it, then your body simply has to deal with it and you should figure out how to treat the symptoms.

What’s strange is that the breakdown of human tissue is not that complex of a process either. Were these top-of-their-class, book-smart medical students to simply review the segment entitled ‘Understanding Body Chemistry’, they would recognize this widespread phenomenon of excessive acidic chemistry within most individuals in modern society. At that point, they may even think twice about whether they should inject, radiate, or prescribe more acidic compounds into an already acidic body. Yes, indeed — in order to achieve expedient results of suppressing symptoms, the entire medical community ubiquitously uses acidic products to treat patients who are already suffering from over-acidity.

The regenerative-based approach to solving problems is completely different. If I am using this philosophy of approaching my body in such a manner so that it can regenerate, then it allows me to open up and try and gain an understanding of why it has degenerated in the first place. I can then seek to solve the source of the degenerated problem of my body, and bring it back to full function. This is a worthy goal and a target worth aiming for— I am not interested in simply treating or masking the symptoms of a current problem. I am committed to full self-actualization in terms of health and wellness.

‘You can’t hit a target you can’t see,’ or a phrase to a similar affect, is one which has helped me in my personal and work affairs. Indeed, what chance do we have of attaining a goal of regeneration and recovery when so-called ‘experts’ are telling us that this is not even possible and so therefore don’t even try?

In essence, the regenerative-based approach allows for the goal to be formulated to completely solve a health problem and return the body back to harmonious balance. Only after this goal is formulated can it be reached. If the goal is never set, and if it were dismissed that the body could actually heal, then the body should certainly not heal and it becomes a sad, self-fulfilling prophecy. So one of the biggest values of the regenerative-based approach is that the intention is set to completely solve the problem.

If I use the regenerative-based approach, then, after I have set out to do so, I can continue using this approach to find out what is causing my health problem. I can then seek to understand true science and universal truth about the nature of reality, chemistry, and how I can reverse the cause of the conflict. Then, I can logically apply my own discoveries to remove the causes or inputs creating the conflict or imbalance within the body. Once the negative causes are removed, then I can simply allow my body’s own ability to work unobstructed, to clean, detoxify, regenerate and heal itself, and I can observe as the body does its thing.

If this doesn’t work, it doesn’t work, and then I go back to the drawing board. However, in my own experience working on my own health issues, this method has worked beautifully, as it has anecdotally also for so many countless others.

This method is not especially complicated — it is indeed simple (although it’s not necessarily easy to implement). This approach is not widely known and it’s certainly not widely promoted. It mostly involves just getting out of the body’s way, and allowing nature to take over to do what it does best, without being blocked by external obstacles as it had previously been.

Nature exists by means of simple laws and principles — concepts of duality, balance, and cause and effect. We too are a part of this natural equation of all of creation. We should not forget that, and it would be wise to humble ourselves and respect the power of this simplicity. We should hold this awareness and gratitude as we maintain this approach to allow for natural regeneration.